Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

The peer review process is the most crucial step in academic publishing, as it aims to ensure the quality, integrity, and credibility of scientific research. The following outlines the main stages of this process:

Submission of the Research Paper

Authors submit their research papers through the journal’s electronic submission system. At this stage, the editorial office verifies the paper’s compliance with the journal’s guidelines regarding format, length, writing style, citation, and referencing.

Editorial Review

At this stage, the paper is reviewed by the Editorial Board to determine its relevance to the journal’s scope and interests, and to ensure it meets the accepted academic standards.
The author may be asked to make initial revisions, or the paper may be rejected outright if it does not meet the requirements.
Additionally, the paper is subjected to a plagiarism check by the citation committee, and the similarity rate must not exceed the allowed limit established by the University Council for each scientific discipline.

Peer Review Process

If the paper passes both the initial screening and plagiarism check, it is sent to two or more expert reviewers specializing in the relevant research field, selected based on their expertise and experience.
The journal follows a double-blind peer review system, in which the reviewers do not know the authors’ identities, and the authors’ names and information are concealed from the reviewers.
This process is designed to promote neutrality, objectivity, and fairness in the evaluation of research papers, while minimizing potential bias that may arise from knowing the identities of the involved parties.

Review Duration and Feedback

The review period shall not exceed two months from the date the reviewers receive the paper. Reviewers provide their recommendations to the Editorial Board, which may include:

  • Acceptance without revisions,

  • Acceptance with revisions, or

  • Rejection of the paper.

Revision Stage

If revisions are requested, the reviewers’ comments are sent to the author to make the required modifications and resubmit the revised version.
If the revisions are substantial, the paper may be sent back to the reviewers for re-evaluation.

Final Decision

The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision regarding the paper based on the reviewers’ recommendations. The decision may include:

  • Final acceptance,

  • Final rejection, or

  • Request for additional revisions.

Publication

Once the paper is finally accepted, it undergoes formatting and language proofreading. A Digital Object Identifier (DOI) is then assigned, and the paper is published in both the online and print versions of the journal, if applicable.